Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Char Renault clairière armistice Rethondes Oise.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Char Renault clairière armistice Rethondes Oise.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2014 at 17:35:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by General Estienne - photographed, uploaded and nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support The famous french tank of the World War One, the "Renault FT 17", on display at the Clairière de l'Armistice in Rethondes, Oise, France. This one is from 1918. -- Jebulon (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Question That color scheme of the tank seems quite different from other photos of the FT 17 on Commons? My immediate thought was that it had just returned from a makeover at "Pimp My Tank" as the colors seems quite far away from camouflage colors, and more like: "Here, here, I' m over here!". But as so often before, I am probably mistaken, and there is a perfectly good reason the colors are as they are? --Slaunger (talk) 20:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Please see here for reference.--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Gee, the colors are authentic. These guys really wanted to be seen! Thanks for the reference.--Slaunger (talk) 20:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Remember it was something completely new, even as concept. General Estienne named it "rush artillery", to break the front line quickly, it was an offensive tool, with machine guns and not cannons. I guess amouflage was on this purpose.--Jebulon (talk) 22:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Gee, the colors are authentic. These guys really wanted to be seen! Thanks for the reference.--Slaunger (talk) 20:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Please see here for reference.--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Cute object but common picture. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Cute? A tank? You aren't lt. Grüber by any chance? Kleuske (talk) 10:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Alvesgaspar, except for the "cute" bit. Kleuske (talk) 10:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per others -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 23:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Could you please explain why you oppose ?--Jebulon (talk) 11:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I think that it is all said, original subject but the composition doesn't make it an FP Poco2 16:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 01:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)