Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 21:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
- Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Wow again.--Ermell (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Amazing, and I'm impressed that the corner sharpness this time is so good. Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak support Huge resolution but underexposed in my view (overall a bit dark) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: , @Wilfredor: , Thanks. you're right about a little darkness. but I captured this place with this light pattern. the light coming from above and left and right of the picture was darker. I found this pattern of light more attractive. if darkness is annoying I can work on it. --Amirpashaei (talk) 05:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- That may improve the attractiveness, yes -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support A bit underexposed --Wilfredor (talk) 03:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support WOW again. --Gnosis (talk) 06:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support The light is better than the ones with more visible reflections. Buidhe (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 13:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support as usual. --Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment How many pictures of this kind have already been nominated and awarded? I think it's getting enough. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Check out Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings. We have 203 FPs of church ceilings, 2 of synagogues, 1 of a temple and 23 of mosque ceilings. I think we can stand a few more of these very high-quality photos. ;-) However, I would really like to see some of the other 4,296 religions represented too. Not even all major religious groups have photos. --Cart (talk) 15:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Killarnee: , @W.carter: I can earn money by selling these picture's copy right. but to be seen by all, I abandon the copy right by uploading them in Wikimedia. I think these works are Masterpieces of Persian architectural art and rarely seen before. I agree with Miss Carter but I think we should consider these pictures Regardless of religion. these pictures reflect pure art and history of ancient world Whether Christian or Muslim. --Amirpashaei (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Of course it's all art and architecture. We just have a rather crude way of sorting photos here on Commons since our tagging system is antiquated. I sincerely thank you for donating these photos to WikiMedia, however there are always voters who get bored if there are a lot of similar photos nominated one after the other, whatever the subject. It's a very picky and tough audience. Perhaps if you had some other views or artwork you could alternate with, then you wouldn't risk what we call "reviewer-fatigue". Most experienced nominators try to mix up their noms to keep the audience alert, since it increases the chances of noms getting featured. FPC is always craving new fresh things. --Cart (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Miss Carter. I consider it. Although I seen voters wondering of my new pictures and that's raised me to nominate them.--Amirpashaei (talk) 17:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- So I've seen several such mosaic pictures in the last few days and think it's enough, which is why I don't give a pro. And what do you want to tell me "you could also sell the pictures"? Should it be blackmail or should I fall at your feet now? -Killarnee (C•T•U) 18:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Showing the architectural masterpieces to the world is my proud and honor. that's caused donating them. it's not blackmailing. you can oppose with my nominations. but I don't understand why you think other voters shouldn't support. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't give a pro because I just think that there are enough pictures of this kind, even if they are well done. At the end of the year, every second picture at POTY is a mosaic picture. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- every of these pictures are unique and designing them took many years. these art works not simple mosaic, they are unique. even now making these masterpieces are very hard and rarely can find architecture could design them. I think you don't know this art well. good luck.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I recognize the art and I know what kind of masterpieces they are, but I would like it if you would nominate landscapes for example. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It seems like most of us are not bored - these ceilings are all really beautiful and different from one another, and we've seen way more pictures of churches than of mosques - but I'd surely love to see other types of photos of beautiful or interesting motifs in Iran, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with Ikan Kekek. Amirpashaei, we have absolutely loads of featured pictures of church interiors and it shouldn't stop us featuring any more as long as we can still find pictures of outstanding quality and extraordinary subjects. The exact same is true with your pictures. In fact we are quite underrepresented with mosques (and even more so with synagogues, Hindu/Sikh temples etc.) compared with churches, so as far as I'm concerned I'm happy to vote support for almost any of these pictures you present us with. Cmao20 (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- @W.carter: , @Ikan Kekek: , @Cmao20: Thanks for your support and high understanding of art. My purpose of nominating these pictures is to be seen better and using in more pages. --Amirpashaei (talk) 07:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- You say "seen better and using in more pages", but this image is not used as far as I can see Amirpashaei. So why not? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- I meant relevant pages. on of the my purposes is saving these monuments in image form. because most of heritage in Iran don't maintain very well.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Charles, I'm not surprised by that. The photo is recently uploaded and the author is foremost a photographer donating his photos to us and not a very active Wikipedian. Not every uploader will immediately go about spreading their photos on as many articles as possible. Also remember that Commons photos are used by many, many other sites outside the Wiki-verse, those uses don't show up on the Commons file page. I often find my photos online in the most unlikely places, but it always takes a while for a photo to get spread. By uploading photos here we make them available for people and that is enough. --Cart (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Miss Carter. Exactly. I agree.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Charles, I'm not surprised by that. The photo is recently uploaded and the author is foremost a photographer donating his photos to us and not a very active Wikipedian. Not every uploader will immediately go about spreading their photos on as many articles as possible. Also remember that Commons photos are used by many, many other sites outside the Wiki-verse, those uses don't show up on the Commons file page. I often find my photos online in the most unlikely places, but it always takes a while for a photo to get spread. By uploading photos here we make them available for people and that is enough. --Cart (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- I meant relevant pages. on of the my purposes is saving these monuments in image form. because most of heritage in Iran don't maintain very well.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- You say "seen better and using in more pages", but this image is not used as far as I can see Amirpashaei. So why not? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- @W.carter: , @Ikan Kekek: , @Cmao20: Thanks for your support and high understanding of art. My purpose of nominating these pictures is to be seen better and using in more pages. --Amirpashaei (talk) 07:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I recognize the art and I know what kind of masterpieces they are, but I would like it if you would nominate landscapes for example. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- every of these pictures are unique and designing them took many years. these art works not simple mosaic, they are unique. even now making these masterpieces are very hard and rarely can find architecture could design them. I think you don't know this art well. good luck.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't give a pro because I just think that there are enough pictures of this kind, even if they are well done. At the end of the year, every second picture at POTY is a mosaic picture. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Showing the architectural masterpieces to the world is my proud and honor. that's caused donating them. it's not blackmailing. you can oppose with my nominations. but I don't understand why you think other voters shouldn't support. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support I find it a bit boring to see so many similar candidates (and ceilings are a bit of a super cooperative easy subjects), but they are all incredible shots in my view. - Benh (talk) 20:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support I'm not bored. :) On the contrary, I find these pictures absolutely stunning. –– B2Belgium (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Amazing. JukoFF (talk) 22:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran