Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg

File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2020 at 13:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
•  Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 13:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 13:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Knocking it out of the park again. Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support With this much detail, as usual, that slight blur in the center is more than forgivable. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 18:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I see magenta CA at the margins of some groups of black tiles, but it's much more noticeable at full size on my 19-inch monitor than on my 13-inch monitor and certainly not a good justification for opposing. However, if you feel like doing the work to eliminate it, that would make this beautiful photo even better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: Thanks Mr Kekek. I worked on it. but there is a problem. camera raw doesn't recognize my lens (24 tilt shift) and can't adjust CA issue in lens correction menu. therefor I should handle it pixel by pixel hardly.--Amirpashaei (talk) 06:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support featured quality, despite weird blurriness in parts of the image. Maybe a stitching issue? Buidhe (talk) 02:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
  • @Buidhe: I dont see any stitching issue and blurriness except the middle of the picture in the lamp (because wind). to adjusting the picture, specify blurriness. thanks.--Amirpashaei (talk) 08:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 22:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Andrei (talk) 07:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: , *@Daniel Case: I found lens profile of canon tse 24mm and added that to lens profile . I adjusted the picture CA as I could and blurry lamp replaced.--Amirpashaei (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment It looks like you got most of it. I still see some CA relatively near the lower left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:55, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ahmad^talk 07:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran