Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CasadeCampo1-Tandil.jpg

File:CasadeCampo1-Tandil.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2016 at 11:44:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:CasadeCampo1-Tandil.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CasadeCampo1-Tandil.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Architecture

all by me --Ezarateesteban 11:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 11:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose It may be an illusion, but it seems to be off-axis, rotated about 0.7° clockwise. Other than that, there seems to be an overall lack of sharpness, there is disturbing chromatic abberation and I don't see much wow in the scene. Storkk (talk) 13:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is a very pedestrian scene and the picture is of mediocre technical quality. dllu (t,c) 21:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment straighten and CA fixed, sharpenning a bit Ezarateesteban 21:50, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow in the composition to me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. If you want to focus in on the typical cottage, you might consider taking a dead-on picture of it, framed by trees, without the big foreground of dirt. I'm not sure you could get a FP out of it that way, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
• If only there were more buildings and maybe some abandoned cars or rusted equipment of some kind to really get the atmosphere. lNeverCry 08:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose As dllu, King of, Ikan Kekek--Morning (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: all these opposes over four days; it's not going to get anywhere near the support it needs to overcome this

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 07:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)