Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CCTV in tree.JPG

File:CCTV in tree.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2010 at 03:44:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:CCTV in tree.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CCTV in tree.JPG

1926

1461

233

112

3266

2408

This is the spot where the focus looks sharpest, IMO. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 19:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Info A CCTV camera in a tree, Key West, FL. All by ianaré (talk) 03:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- ianaré (talk) 03:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality and valuable from an educational standpoint. Steven Walling 05:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Cody escadron delta (talk) 10:36, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment - Come on guys, not even the image quality is acceptable! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose lacking visual impact --99of9 (talk) 23:13, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose, unsharp and mostly uninteresting, sorry. --Aqwis (talk) 08:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

• Not unsharp : low DOF is used to bring subject out of background. --ianaré (talk) 08:33, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

• The camera is unsharp. --Aqwis (talk) 08:50, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

• Focus is on the 'eye', the mount yes is a little blurry due to low DOF. I must not be seeing what you're seeing. --ianaré (talk) 09:55, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

• This has nothing to do with focus, this has to do with the poor optical quality of the lens with which this picture was taken. --Aqwis (talk) 12:18, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

• LOL it's an $1100 L series lens. --ianaré (talk) 16:55, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

• Then I can't explain it. Maybe it's the focus after all or maybe my eyes are being fooled. Regardless, that wasn't the main reason for my opposition. --Aqwis (talk) 07:48, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

• That was a.. ..well.. ..weird coment. --Dschwen (talk) 20:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

• The part in sharpest focus seems to be the knob thingy under the tip of the mount, and the DoF is so low that even the "eye" of the camera isn't perfectly in focus. I think that's what Aqwis is probably seeing. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 19:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose why, the composition and location doesnt contribute to anything of interest. Its just an uninteresting image that doesnt wow me Gnangarra 11:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's not sharp. If it was you should be able to read the text under the camera lens. Shortling (talk) 15:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose this pic documents cctv very well...but for FP I think it is not enough --AngMoKio (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination testing ... --ianaré (talk) 17:12, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
• "Its just an uninteresting image that doesnt wow me" is IMO uselessly contemptuous. If you are not interessed by the subject, don't vote (see Alvesgaspar's rules) --Jebulon (talk) 10:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)