Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brugge Sashuis R01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Brugge Sashuis R01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2016 at 21:00:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
- Info created by MJJR - uploaded by MJJR - nominated by MJJR -- MJJR (talk) 21:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Question Do you think you could clone out the blue-red selfie couple ?--Jebulon (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that the cloning out is not easy to do. Of course, the image would be nicer without the blue-red couple. On the other hand, the spot is very touristic and thus pretty crowded. The presence of selfie takers is just part of the reality there. So I prefer to keep them into the picture. -- MJJR (talk) 16:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Really pretty! I feel like a marginally tighter crop on the right side would be optimal, though, in order to eliminate the sliver of a building, the two right-most people, and the part of a tree trunk. If it's not fully clear where I'm suggesting a crop, I may try to use the crop tool to input a line for the suggested new right margin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion. I agree. I made a slight crop, but with preservation of the whole willow tree. Doing so, the tower spire stays in the middle of the picture. -- MJJR (talk) 16:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - Excellent. And by the way, I don't mind that the tourists taking a selfie are in the photo. That's real life that was going on there and hardly visible at full-page size, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion. I agree. I made a slight crop, but with preservation of the whole willow tree. Doing so, the tower spire stays in the middle of the picture. -- MJJR (talk) 16:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Idyllic. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 23:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:29, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support mainly for the almost perfect composition, IMO --Hubertl 08:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:06, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support per others --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support In spite of the red-blue selfie couple of %*+<~¥° tourists.--Jebulon (talk) 20:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It´s a menace. --Hubertl 20:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Jebulon and Hubertl: I think people taking selfies make wonderful subjects. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It´s a menace. --Hubertl 20:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Halavar (talk) 19:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Very traditional composition and nice :) --Laitche (talk) 20:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support very nice -- Jiel (talk) 22:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Lovely springtime mood; I like that the photographer avoided blowing the cloud highlights. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places