Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brescia duomo Broletto e Torre del Popolo.jpg

File:Brescia duomo Broletto e Torre del Popolo.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2019 at 17:32:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Brescia duomo Broletto e Torre del Popolo.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brescia duomo Broletto e Torre del Popolo.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Italy
•  Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:32, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:32, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Is there light yellow/green CA on the dome near the longitudinal lines, or is that coloration really on the dome? Otherwise, the slight noise at full size is IMO no big deal and the way the perspective distorts the shapes of the dome and statues is OK, and I would support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral Sorry, I generally admire your photos very much but I honestly think the crop on the left-hand side is too tight here. It just looks a little bit awkward to me. Cmao20 (talk) 19:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Abstain I do not wish to vote on this image--BoothSift 03:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 06:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The perspective correction by software or the lens so verticals stay vertical leads to unnatural shapes and overal feeling of being stretched which is not pleasant to look at. This is a fundamental problem of rendering the world as we see it onto a flat sensor plane so I would have chosen to stand somewhere more in front. The left crop is definitely too tight and the cut in half car on the bottom is not ideal either. – Lucas 09:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lucas: trying to force 100% vertical verticals in this kind of image is futile and led to heavy distortion (e.g. of the dome). --El Grafo (talk) 09:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lucas and Cmao20. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others -- Piotr Bart (talk) 13:08, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose unfortunately per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:38, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose same. Very boring composition to start with and much of a tourist snapshot feel. - Benh (talk)
•  Oppose Per others -- Ryan Hodnett (talk) 00:05, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose OMG. I taught for a second that somebody put something to my lemonade. The distortion is enourmous :) So as per boys. -- Jakub Fryš (talk) 03:55, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per everyone else; I think this nomination has passed its expiration date if you get my meaning. Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Question So what do you want me to do? Drown miself? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:01, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

You could drown the nomination ... Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

That's already been done ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:44, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 9 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--BoothSift 23:16, 7 June 2019 (UTC)