Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boletus chrysenteron (Red Cracking Bolete).JPG

File:Boletus chrysenteron (Red Cracking Bolete).JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2010 at 22:28:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Boletus chrysenteron (Red Cracking Bolete).JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boletus chrysenteron (Red Cracking Bolete).JPG

•  Info all by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:28, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:28, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral would support a solid black background version. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 23:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

• Imo it's very good that we haven't always the same withe or black reworked and unnaturally backgrounds. I wouldn't change it. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:52, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

 Comment applying a uniform background like grey/white/black gives a more professional look to the items than a "home brew" light setting. it sure is a question of personal taste. if performing a solid version one should as well consider a transparent version, granting ultimate reuse options. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 19:45, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, but I don't like the arrangement, you could've maybe aligned them. The shadows are strange, must be multiple sources of light or reflections and it's too fluorescent-looking. A scale of some sort would help too. --IdLoveOne (talk) 04:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:20, 6 November 2010 (UTC)