Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boeing 767-300.JPG

File:Boeing 767-300.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2010 at 00:05:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Boeing 767-300.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boeing 767-300.JPG

•  Info everything by Wolf (talk) 00:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf (talk) 00:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I'd like a tighter crop on the right and a looser one on the left, but good nonetheless. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:13, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Actually, all things considered, and per the below comment, I still think there should be a tad more room behind, but I like the sky in front. It rather gives it a feeling that it's going somewhere. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Strong support Sorry, HFSW, but I gotta disagree, usually don't see a point in too much lead room, but I think it's well-done here. To me cropping the right would cause there to be more boring white. This is already one of my favorite plane in flight pics. --IdLoveOne (talk) 03:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose quality okay, but just little detail and composition does not convince me. I know better shots of you. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Please add more categories. --99of9 (talk) 04:18, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Enough? :) Wolf (talk) 07:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Yes, thanks. --99of9 (talk) 23:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Large overexposed areas and ca on the left side. --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Reflection of Perfection (talk) 13:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:11, 2 October 2010 (UTC)