Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bluff erosion in Pacifica 2.jpg

File:Bluff erosion in Pacifica 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2009 at 21:20:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bluff erosion in Pacifica 2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bluff erosion in Pacifica 2.jpg

•  Info everything by mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 21:20, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Info On November 17, 2009 30 feet chunk of the cliff below the apartment building fell to Pacific Ocean. Residents were given 20 minutes to evacuate the building. Now the workers are trying to save it.Here's view from a balcony of the next building and here is the crane they used to throw boulders under the cliff
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 21:20, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good image with a very high EV given the event (& events in the world as a whole!). Even more focus on the erosion would be equally appropriate --Herby ^{talk thyme} 19:00, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I prefer this version. --99of9 (talk) 23:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 00:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Or this one --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't see anything special --Llorenzi (talk) 20:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

You are so right! What could be special in an image of the building that is about to fall into ocean? My bad, next time I will try to come up with something more special--Mbz1 (talk) 21:38, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

I believe Llorenzi meant that picture is nothing special, not the object. --Leafnode✉ 13:36, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose crop not showing what's directly below the building, hazy, unsharp --Leafnode✉ 13:36, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

You forgot to oppose original --Mbz1 (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)