Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een Berenklauw (Heracleum) 12-06-2022. (d.j.b 02.jpg

File:Bloemknop van een Berenklauw (Heracleum) 12-06-2022. (d.j.b 02.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2022 at 15:01:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een Berenklauw (Heracleum) 12-06-2022. (d.j.b 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een Berenklauw (Heracleum) 12-06-2022. (d.j.b 02.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Apiaceae (Carrot family)
•  Info Flower bud of a Heracleum (plant). Focus stack of 18 photos.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment The split background doesn't improve the image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Can we get a short desc in English? — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 16:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

  • Nevermind, I did it myself Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 16:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Neutral — I like it, but it has some issues. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 16:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good to me. I don't understand the issues. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

  The spider web is a little annoying, which is why I'm not supporting. But there aren't any serious issues in the actual image itself, which is why I'm not opposing. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 20:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

• Since you can choose the background for this type of shot, I am surprised at the one chosen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

*Answer: In this case, I didn't have much choice because the hogweed just happened to be here. The size of the flower bud, the color and pattern of the bud, The position of the leaf on top of the bud and the position of the sun this was the best position.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

• The background is OK with me and the spider web was OK, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support In the original size the background is OK for me. --IamMM (talk) 12:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 12:58, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The spider web even adds some “reality feeling” to it. --Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Quality is good, as usual, but the background and, above all, the subject itself (I don't find that bud near to beautiful) make me oppose, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 17:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Neutral you can change the background with the different height of a tripod (I do it regularly). --Ivar (talk) 17:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Poco a poco --Lupe (talk) 19:18, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles and Ivar. And the plants bar is pretty high here so I think we can be picky. - Benh (talk) 20:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Split background and ordinary light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles and Ivar. -- Karelj (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 26 June 2022 (UTC)