Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Big Sur Waterfall.jpg

File:Big Sur Waterfall.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2014 at 18:19:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Big Sur Waterfall.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Big Sur Waterfall.jpg

•  Info created by Vadim Kurland - uploaded by Mono - nominated by Mono -- —Mono (how to reply) 18:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- —Mono (how to reply) 18:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I'll need convincing that water colour is natural. Seems way too intense. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not completely sure. I didn't take the picture, but I've been there and it's certainly within the realm of possibility. It really depends on camera settings and yes, postprocessing. —Mono (how to reply) 19:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

I should have did this before commenting (as I usually do) but I took the time to look at other images of this spot. That bright almost luminescent colour seems to be common to most of the images. Quite striking actually. Saffron Blaze (talk) 02:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

 Oppose bad crop. The composition does not works for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:06, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose The resolution is very low for a shot like this and yet there's significant noise and the detail has suffered from that. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 09:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Jee 05:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)