Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin - Friedrichswerdersche Kirche - Innenansicht (9734).jpg

File:Berlin - Friedrichswerdersche Kirche - Innenansicht (9734).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2022 at 08:20:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin - Friedrichswerdersche Kirche - Innenansicht (9734).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin - Friedrichswerdersche Kirche - Innenansicht (9734).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
•  Info Interior of the Friedrichswerdersche Kirche (Friedrichswerder Church), Berlin, Germany. The Friedrichswerdersche Kirche was built in 1824–1831 by the famous architect Karl Friedrich Schinkel on the instructions of Frederick William IV of Prussia. It was the first Gothic Revival church in Berlin. Today the church is used as a museum to display a collection of nineteenth-century German sculptures. Photograph created and uploaded by T meltzer, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 08:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC).
•  Support I am aware that church interior shots are sometimes considered boring ;–), but I think this shot is something special. I love the combination of natural light from outside and the illumination inside, it gives the image a very special mood, calm yet full of power. I also like the contrast between the magnificent symmetric Gothic revival church architecture and the loosely placed sculptures. Sharpness, colours and perspective are also excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 08:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

File renaming, already done
Info I will rename the file to something more meaningful as soon as the jury works for WLM 2022 are done. Right now, renaming the file would confuse the hard-working jury ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)  Done The jury work is over, I have been informed that I can already do the renaming. --Aristeas (talk) 11:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Nothing thoroughly thought and -almost- flawlessly executed is boring :) The only caveat I see is the highlight handling, but it is not bad enough to detract from the beauty of the architecture in my view. - Benh (talk) 08:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 14:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Was on my list to nominate Cmao20 (talk) 15:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Great! Not boring to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I fully agree with you, Aristeas ... except on the part of this being potentially boring! --Kritzolina (talk) 21:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --PierreSelim (talk) 08:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 09:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 06:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per nom. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 23:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Wieggy (talk) 11:27, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany