Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belfry Panormitis monastery.jpg

File:Belfry Panormitis monastery.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2012 at 13:44:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Belfry Panormitis monastery.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belfry Panormitis monastery.jpg

•  Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 13:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support View of the colorful belfry of the Monastery of Archangel Michael in Panormitis, in the little island of Symi, Dodecanese, Greece.-- Jebulon (talk) 13:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment oversaturated --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 17:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
    •  Oppose yes. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
      • Wow ! What a friendly behaviour ! --Jebulon (talk) 18:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
        • ?!? :-/ --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
        • File:Belfry Panormitis monastery-CN.jpg --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
          • Undersaturated under greek sun.:-/--Jebulon (talk) 19:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose In-camera processing or post-processing has removed lots of fine details. Colours (saturation) could be OK, I can't judge that. Composition is a bit random and there might be a slight CCW tilt. พ.s. 08:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
• Thanks for serious, even if negative, review. I don't think lots of details are lost, and don't see any obvious tilt. Composition is matter of taste and was maybe wrong in your opinion, but not random. I need other opinions, please.--Jebulon (talk) 13:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Weak support I don't see problems with this picture besides the crop. Don't think it is random but it is not optimal either. --Paolo Costa (talk) 07:16, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose oversaturated --Llorenzi (talk) 09:16, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
  • No.--Jebulon (talk) 11:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)