Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo al Celio - Interior.jpg

File:Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo al Celio - Interior.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2016 at 20:32:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo al Celio - Interior.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo al Celio - Interior.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support well done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Well, this is different, looks more like a ball room than a church. Is it always this decorated with flowers or is this for some special occasion? --cart-Talk 22:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

 CommentHi cart,is often used for weddings in Rome,thanks--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support - There are some places in the upper frescoes that are almost too bright, but not quite, but you needed the settings you used to get the lower frescoes to photograph so well and I think you did very well to take an exposure that got everything in well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support. Fixed the link to EN FPC in the assessment template in file too. Jee 02:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:14, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 03:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Sharpness is not perfect, but very nice overall. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Well done --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I don't like the darkish areas at the sides, and the partially overexposed frescos. Don't we have a very high bar on church interiors? --A.Savin 13:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Weak support per King. There are parts that could be better, but overall this looks like the sort of image that could have come out a lot worse, with far more blown or clipped areas than it has. Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good stuff, you didnt went far with colors. Thats OK. --Mile (talk) 20:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing. ~★ nmaia ^{[[mia diskuto]]} 02:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I'm sorry, Livio, I thought about A.Savin's remark and Diliff's church interiors and then looked at this photo again. I do like the photo, but I don't think it really is comparable to the greatest church interiors we've featured, and I agree with A.Savin's criticisms. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Nice dynamic range. --Laitche (talk) 15:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 11:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 22:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors