Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basel - Spalentor.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Basel - Spalentor.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2014 at 19:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by Wladyslaw. High resolution image of the Gate of Spalen in Basel, Switzerland (build in the 2nd half of the 14th century). This beautiful gate is difficult to photography because it is located at a very busy street with disturbing traffic. Otherwise there are also disturbing power lines of the trams so so have to choose a location that shows the gate in a nice way and avoids distration of those points. -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC) P.S. In case of interest you can check out my new photo web page ;-) http://www.sojka.photo
- Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment you must crop it a bit at right, there is some pieces of a white frame near the top at right -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- new crop, particular because of the traffic light on the left --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 05:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral bitte folgendes überdenken: Deine Entzerrungen scheinen viel zu sehr in die Höhe gezogen zu werden. Dadurch wirkt der Turm bzw. der obere Teil viel zu hoch im Vergleuch zur seiner Umgebung. Schon dieses Bild: zeigt es deutlich. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:25, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Dass wir hier keine völlig entzerrungsfreie Ansicht haben ist normal und liegt in der Natur der Sache. Allerdings kann von einem VIEL an Verzerrung kaum die Rede sein wenn die Winkel des Dreiecks sind nicht mal um 10% unterscheiden. Dass dein Beispielbild an anderen Dingen krankt müssen wir glaube ich nicht erörtern. Meine schräge Ansicht hat zudem den Vorteil, dass man den Vorbau deutlich besser erfassen kann. Ein Bild hat auch weit mehr Aspekte als absolute Verzerrungsfreiheit. --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:26, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 23:08, 18 June 2014 (UTC)