Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Backscatter on Resciesa Val Gardena.jpg

File:Backscatter on Resciesa Val Gardena.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2012 at 08:42:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Backscatter on Resciesa Val Gardena.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Backscatter on Resciesa Val Gardena.jpg

•  Info created by User:Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose insufficient quality plus many dust spots. --Ivar (talk) 09:44, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

 Info Thanks for the notification of the dustspots which have been fixed. Could you please be more specific about the insufficient quality? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment On your image color depth is insufficient to accurately sample a continuous gradation of color tone (it's called colour banding). --Ivar (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

It is to increse the effect of backscattering - the trees are not the main object.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

• Perhaps that was the intent, but it makes it look like a low quality GIF as opposed to a photo. 131.137.245.209 10:32, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 07:55, 4 August 2012 (UTC)