Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baby Banana Plant.jpg

File:Baby Banana Plant.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2016 at 09:04:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Baby Banana Plant.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baby Banana Plant.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/add_the_category_here
•  Info created by Nepali keto62 - uploaded by Nepali keto62 - nominated by Nepali keto62 -- NepaliKeto62 ^{Talk to me} 09:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- NepaliKeto62 ^{Talk to me} 09:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I'm sorry, but that's not special in any way and not even sharp at full size. I wasn't surprised when I checked and saw that you took that picture with a cell phone. Cell phone pictures have no chance of being among the most outstanding on the site and also routinely fail when nominated at Quality Image Candidates. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Well, it might be possible to get a cellphone shot featured, but it would have to be really very special as for composition or lighting to make up for the unavoidable quality drawbacks. QI, on the other hand, is virtually impossible, that’s right. --Kreuzschnabel 06:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan. The leaves are cropped out, and this plant is not identified. --★ Poké⁹⁵ 09:53, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, for above --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) 14:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. INeverCry 22:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose This is the worst quality I’ve seen here for months. Severe loss of detail, pixelated (obviously upscaled). Far from QI. I really don’t see what’s supposed to be special here. --Kreuzschnabel 06:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of everything posted above. - Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)