Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Assisi - Comune di Assisi - Piazza inferiore di San Francesco - 2023-09-22 23-21-26 001.jpg

File:Assisi - Comune di Assisi - Piazza inferiore di San Francesco - 2023-09-22 23-21-26 001.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2023 at 20:53:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Assisi - Comune di Assisi - Piazza inferiore di San Francesco - 2023-09-22 23-21-26 001.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Assisi - Comune di Assisi - Piazza inferiore di San Francesco - 2023-09-22 23-21-26 001.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
•  Info The Lower Square of (La Piazza Inferiore di) San Francesco, opens at the end of a narrow street, which can be glimpsed in the central perspective of this spectacular portico that surrounds the large square. Furthermore, in my opinion, the perspective play of the geometric stone flooring of various colors is very beautiful and harmonious. The comfortable porticoes were built in 1474, at the beginning of the Italian Renaissance, and served to house small shops in an orderly manner where all the pilgrims heading towards the Basilica of Assisi could find objects, food, and comfort. all by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 05:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Both sides leaning out, specially the right one Poco a poco (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks, the verticals have been corrected. A new image has been uploaded. --Terragio67 (talk) 12:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support ★ 17:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I would have loved for the buildings on the left to be sharper, and I'd also like to see this view in warm light, but I like the combination of repetition and variation, the unusual variegated pavement, and the dramatic clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Maybe the others are right that there should be more sharpness. Vote crossed out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose OK for QI but nothing really special for FP. -- Karelj (talk) 11:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

  You don't consider the architecture special? --SHB2000 (talk) 12:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 12:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Only the foreground is in focus and the rest unfortunately not. The people at the end of the square do not fit the overall picture.--Ermell (talk) 12:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Dear all, thank you for your reviews. Making some clarifications, this square is 50 meters long. Once I found a suitable point to have an attractive perspective, I found myself faced with the forced choice of a loss of focus on the foreground or background. Honestly, I was tempted by the first choice, but the Renaissance square includes the fifteenth-century colonnade and, in addition, the intriguing, colorful, and modern paved floor, changed my mind. So, I had no doubts thinking only of the Renaissance history of the portico. However, I accept your criticisms, saying I am satisfied to have drawn attention to one of the most underrated places in Assisi. -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

* Oppose Lack of DoF --Wilfredor (talk) 02:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC) I preffer withdraw from participating in this section --Wilfredor (talk) 11:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Neutral Thank you very much for the photo! I remember the Piazza inferiore very well – normally visitors look only to the other direction, towards the wonderful Basilica di San Francesco, but the Piazza inferiore itself with its Renaissance collonades has its own appeal. So your photo brings back good memories. However I share the reservations about the detail resolution, sorry. It’s certainly not bad and still a very useful photo, but for FP we would wish for even better results. --Aristeas (talk) 07:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Softness is lacking a bit (it looks more due to extensive perspective fix than lack of DOF). And camera position looks to be closer to the left wall than the right one (edit: framing nicely mitigate but the middle line kills it for me). Overall missing some wow factor. Also agree with Ermell re the people. - Benh (talk) 16:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment I agree that the lack of detail is an issue, have you tried to apply more sharpness? Poco a poco (talk) 08:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

  No, not yet, but I would like to try to do it without ruining the drama of the sky. Terragio67 (talk) 12:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Done Thank you for the feedback Poco a poco. I sharpened the image and added some edges previously cropped-out. In order to see the new one, delete the cache. --Terragio67 (talk) 13:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

• The sharpness is a bit better indeed, but not really good. The main issue now is though that you broke the rythm of the picurte with the new bottom crop. Furthermore the need for vertical correction on the right is there again Poco a poco (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

  I agree... I have to crop-out the image, because it could be also considered a different version. I'm going to fix verticals again on the right, because Darktable is fooled by the columns, which are not all vertical also due to the Umbria and Marche 1997 earthquake... Kind regards. Terragio67 (talk) 16:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)