Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Annapurna South-5120.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Annapurna South-5120.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2020 at 07:05:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Thank you @Ikan Kekek: ✓ Done dust spot removed.--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 07:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, you got them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Keep in mind that at > 4000m the atmosphere is much thinner than at sea level, which leads to much more UV and other short-wave light in the spectrum (Michael Freeman even has a section on this type of light that he calls "High Altitude Blue" in his Capturing Light: The Heart of Photography). Combine that with the low air pollution you may still find in remote areas like this, and you do indeed get much bluer skies. If you brighten that up, it's going to look even more unrealistic less like what most of us are used to. --El Grafo (talk) 09:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • A good way to see if the sky is too dark, is to compare with photos of clouds taken from airplanes. Cumulus clouds are generally at an altitude of "less than 2,000 m", which is considerably lower than this photo. The dark sky here looks just fine to me. --Cart (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I'd need to see the RAW file. I was looking at this view at the same time of day and about the same time of year (November 2019) I wish the sky had been this colour! Air pollution is not low at low altitudes around Pokhara. The image is not taken from 4000m. Charles (talk) 12:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]