Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerestempel gammeltorv 1749.jpg

File:Aerestempel gammeltorv 1749.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2011 at 09:36:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Aerestempel gammeltorv 1749.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerestempel gammeltorv 1749.jpg

•  Info uploaded by Urbandweller - nominated by Urbandweller -- Urbandweller (talk) 09:36, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Urbandweller (talk) 09:36, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Raghith 09:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 00:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support But shouldn't the source be a little more descriptive? Is this from a book? – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 12:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment The image is a digital scan made available on-line by the Danish Royal Library. ----Urbandweller (talk) 23:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Needs cleaning and restoration work, and per the question above.--Jebulon (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 19:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose It looks like someone spilt coffee on it. --99of9 (talk) 01:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment This is the version that the Royal Library has provided. There is no version available superior to this one and I doubt that the library will provide a better version in the near future. It is also a question of restoration philosophy - maybe they decided to leave the patina. Should all old prints and books look like they come straight from the printing press? ----Urbandweller (talk) 12:34, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per 99of9. Tomer T (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Restoration work too poor --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

 Urbandweller (talk) 05:16, 27 May 2011 (UTC)