Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Achterwasser Usedom Dewichow Nacht 01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Achterwasser Usedom Dewichow Nacht 01.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2016 at 11:58:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
- Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 11:58, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 11:58, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support as a QI I promoted. Daniel Case (talk) 00:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Calm, nice colors. INeverCry 03:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- SupportMö1997 (Questions ?!?!) 12:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose no wow + some oversharpening (?) Kruusamägi (talk) 07:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a FP for me. Partly too dark and lacks sharpness. --Milseburg (talk) 11:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- Mild Oppose - I've been undecided, and that's why I didn't vote on this photo until now. I think that it misses the point to say that the photo lacks sharpness - it clearly isn't meant to be sharp, so that's a mere observation. And unsharpness can be good for artistic reasons, such as in the wonderful, colorful mountain dawn pictures we've loved so much. The reason I'm voting against this picture now isn't because of a general disagreement with unsharpness, but because it's so unsharp that I can't identify what I'm looking at on the left side, and though the composition is pretty, I don't find it outstanding. If I were simply judging whether this was a good photo I enjoyed looking at at full-page size, I would support, but for a Featured Picture, it falls a bit short to my eyes and mind. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice dreamy pic for an illustration of some kind, but not that extraordinary or FP for me. Sorry. w.carter-Talk 22:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)