Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Au Argenstein Panorama.jpg

File:360° Au Argenstein Panorama.jpg, not featured

•  Info all by --Böhringer (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Böhringer (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I think that a 180 degrees panorama centered on the church would offer a better composition, since the interesting phenomenon is centered there. As well, a moiré pattern in visible on the track, probably from post-processing (downsampling?) --S23678 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

nein, der moiré-effekt verschwindet, wenn man das Bild komplett öffnet. --Böhringer (talk) 23:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

No, moiré is visible at full resolution as well (on the upper portion of the "center track"). It's small, but easily avoided by full resolution. --S23678 (talk) 00:24, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

•  Neutral Once again, excellent technical quality. I didn't see any significant Moíre. However, I don't find the location spot as beautiful as with your previous panorama. Maybe it is the church shadow trick, which might be excellent in a narrower crop, but maybe isn't optimal for 360-panorama. The composition does not work well IMO when viewing this downscaled to fit the screen. Anyway, when scrolling through it in 1:1, the picture works very well. This time Neutral from me, but please keep up your excellent work! (You have probably spoiled us since I would have probably voted "Support" if I hadn't seen your previous panoramas. :-)) I'll actually be in Austria next week and hope to see and enjoy views which would be near to something as beautiful as with your best panoramas. --MattiPaavola (talk) 11:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Ich glaube das Panorama hat kleine Stitching-Fehler. (Die "unscharfen Streifen" in der Spur unterhalb Damüls) Je-str (talk) 12:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose, I agree with MattiPaavola. --Aqwis (talk) 18:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)