Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2019-03-16 03 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2019-03-16 03 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 10:08:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Chile
Info created & uploaded by GRDN711 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)- Support Buidhe (talk) 10:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support Resolution is a bit low, but the light makes up for it IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support Nice light. -- Colin (talk) 20:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support Interesting photo and a good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support per previous speakers. --Aristeas (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Neutral IMO the sharpness should be better. Why f/5.6? --XRay talk 13:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)- Neutral To answer XRay's point, they probably used a polarizer. Why else would you need ISO 400 with an exposure setting of 1/250s at f/5.6? ISO 800 is venturing into dangerous territory for a landscape so f/5.6 is probably the best compromise. I think the technical quality is fine given the wow, but the sky looks weird; unfortunately you just can't use a polarizer on such a wide frame of view. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 16:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Meiræ 21:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Imo 1600px on the short edge is pretty low, in particular for a 7 image panorama made with a high quality camera, yet the image does not appear overly sharp. I also don't find the subject / composition overly interesting, although the light is quite nice. --DXR (talk) 22:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)- Oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Chile
