Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20160803 - Meiktila, Myanmar - Phaung Daw U Pagoda - 7321.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:20160803 - Meiktila, Myanmar - Phaung Daw U Pagoda - 7321.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2016 at 09:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created and uploaded by User:Jakub Hałun - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Support - I think this is a really striking image and a fine picture of the pagoda. I can imagine objections to the wires and the modern tower, but that's what's there and I find the photo a worthy candidate, anyway. We can consider it a picture with the pagoda in the foreground and a slice of life in modern Myanmar in the background, including the people who I at first thought were cultivating rice but may be gathering something growing by itself near the lake. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose I'm afraid that it has several technical issues. BTW I woudln't despise clonig out wires and towers since photographically speaking they don't represent well "a slice of modern life" but are rather disturbing. Sorry--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment - Of course I understand and even anticipated the reaction you're giving me, but to partly address it (and I hope this doesn't come across as vehement, let alone personal, and I mention that in parentheses because I know it's very easy to misread tone online): I think people may be too quick to clone things out. Not everything in a photo needs to be a perfect representation of an ideal view that doesn't exist. The wires and the tower exist, and the pagoda is maintained in a modern country that has electricity and other things. It's not some mythical, timeless thing of anyone's imagination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment On the contrary, I appreciate your comment but it's obviously a matter of personal taste and a lenghty discussion out op place here --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:52, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Info @Jakubhal: I removed several dust spots, fixed perspective distortion and added slghtly sharpness for main subject. Please revert, if it's not ok with you. --Ivar (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- It's fine, thank you. -- Jakubhal 18:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 18:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Nice perspective. Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support cart-Talk 17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Almost reminds me of that big gold lying Buddha statue in Thailand. INeverCry 23:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Jee 02:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 22:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 20:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
