Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014.07.26.-06-Neckar Mannheim-Feudenheim--Mittlerer Wegerich.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2014.07.26.-06-Neckar Mannheim-Feudenheim--Mittlerer Wegerich.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2015 at 21:50:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Hockei (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)- Support very good for a non studio-work. Even though it´s a weak support, the background is not perfect.--Hubertl (talk) 08:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Not bad but oversharpened as yet --Kreuzschnabel 10:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Fixed I've reduced the sharpening. Good now? --Hockei (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Neutral Looks better --Kreuzschnabel 20:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Question I find the composition distracting with the flower in the background and not convinced sharpness is good enough --Charles (talk) 18:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Info Do you mean "The flower" on the left side? This is the same plant and part of the composition. Due to the sharpness, be aware that the blossom is quite filigree. --Hockei (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I meant the big flower - everyone's ideas on composition are different, so I wouldn't worry about it. --Charles (talk) 20:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, in comparison to the numerous great plant-FPs that we have, I think this looks quite flat. There is almost no contrast beyond the diffuse object colour. — Julian H.✈ 13:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed New version with more contrast. --Hockei (talk) 13:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination My reason is not the quality of the photo but the plant itself. The colors of the blossom are too pale compared to other specimens so that I'm not convinced anymore. --Hockei (talk) 13:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
