Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2010 Malaysian GP opening lap.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2010 Malaysian GP opening lap.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2015 at 10:36:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
- Info created and uploaded by Morio - nominated by -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 10:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 10:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose This slight tilt might be ok for a QI, I think it's not good for a FP like this. --Kadellar (talk) 12:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Great racing scene! A little motion blurr is due to action and thus acceptable here. Very vivid. --Tremonist (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Tilt can be corrected. --Tremonist (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Is a panoramic curve, I like in this way.... --Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Wow --LivioAndronico talk 14:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good! -- No EXIF Data :-( --XRay talk 19:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment No sense of movement... This is one of those things, race cars are supposed to be fast, racing photography is kind of expected to convey presicely that... #REDIRECT[[1]] --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing wrong with taking this. But ... we have varying degrees of sharpness that can't be explained by the fact that the cars are moving since not only does it not apply equally to all of them, it affects some of the track as well, and there's that crop. I think this picture tried to do too much. QI for sure but no star. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice colors and angle but I think the opening lap is not good timing for this composition since tis very crowded with cars. --Laitche (talk) 10:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Please don't misunderstand it's not a revenge vote... --Laitche (talk) 12:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral its a bit crowded, perharps a images taken a few second earlier would have been better.--ArildV (talk) 15:44, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Quality is not bad, but it is too crowded and somehow static Poco2 18:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results: