Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15th Arrondissement of Paris as seen from Pont de Bir-Hakeim 140507 1.jpg

File:15th Arrondissement of Paris as seen from Pont de Bir-Hakeim 140507 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2014 at 08:15:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:15th Arrondissement of Paris as seen from Pont de Bir-Hakeim 140507 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15th Arrondissement of Paris as seen from Pont de Bir-Hakeim 140507 1.jpg

•  Info created by DXR - uploaded by DXR - nominated by Claus -- Claus (talk) 08:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --But can you remove the grey clouds at right? Claus (talk) 08:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks Claus for the nomination! I tried removing the gray cloud in the upper right corner, but I have not found a solution that is sufficiently realistic and true to reality and so I would prefer not to change it. --DXR (talk) 10:18, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I like it! The composition is good, the light delicate and the detail level very high. And please keep the grey cloud! --Slaunger (talk) 19:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support One of those photos you don't think would work, but it does—I like the perspective lines from the buildings and the water. A good demonstration of how Paris's architectural beauty is not limited to its historic buildings. Daniel Case (talk) 21:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I don't mind the grey cloud - in fact it's great! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 11:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose image off, half of the faces of the buildings facing the viewer are in the shade. Also, do not send me particular emotion or beauty. PS: you should use some of the subjects' newest showcase for these images, now they are all the same proposals --Pava (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry Pava, I don't really understand your comments (language-wise). Would you be kind enough to explain your last sentence? If you meant showing single towers, then I have to say that this is impossible due to commons' copyright rules which mean that basically no modern building in France can be pictured alone. Also, if you look at the position, it's pretty much impossible to get both the NNE and the NWW facades in perfect light at the same time. --DXR (talk) 06:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes but this light, this angle, is not the best choice among the possible. All the facades of the buildings facing the target (the one who sees the photo) are in the shade. There is a strong imbalance of light between left (dark) and right (bright), and that cloud (top right) is a real black eye "a punch in the eye". OT: Then here we discuss the quality of the photo, we all know the limitations of NO FOP, even Italy (the country with the most beautiful buildings in the world), does not have the freedom alas, landscape, killing literally photography and promotion of the area (that cunning -. -) I understand a lot of what you mean, I'm Italian, this serious problem I have at home. --Pava (talk) 18:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment The left is leaning out a little bit -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 05:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Christian, should be  Done --DXR (talk) 13:35, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

 Support Sorry DXR, I forgot you. It's better, the light too is much better, nice picture and nice quality! -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 23:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Great picture, wonderful city.--Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Well, P e z i has made a useful suggestion to brighten the cloud a bit. I have done that and while it is a minor change, I think this balances the image much better while remaining faithful to the truth of the scene. --DXR (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco² 15:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes