Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:櫻川札.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:櫻川札.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2015 at 12:55:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by User:Outlookxp - uploaded by Outlookxp - nominated by Mirrys -- Mirrys (talk) 12:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Mirrys (talk) 12:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)- Info This is Japanese style playing cards - Tenshō karuta (File:小松札.png, File:黒札.png) 16th century - 17th century. --Laitche (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Laitche. And do you like the way they are depicted here? You are familiar with the subject. --Tremonist (talk) 15:47, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Tremonist: No, I am not familiar with this subject, before this nomination I didn't know what is this but I recognized some Japanese in this image so I checked this with ja Wikipedia... --Laitche (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Laitche: Thank you. Could have been you had to do with such cards before. Might have helped understanding the importance of this picture. :) --Tremonist (talk) 16:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Tremonist: No, I am not familiar with this subject, before this nomination I didn't know what is this but I recognized some Japanese in this image so I checked this with ja Wikipedia... --Laitche (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Laitche. And do you like the way they are depicted here? You are familiar with the subject. --Tremonist (talk) 15:47, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good preservation
in 400 years ago(I guess this is reproduction), rarity and nice colours. --Laitche (talk) 07:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC) - Support I agree with Laitche. --Tremonist (talk) 13:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Oppose- @Slaunger: Fixed. Yann (talk) 19:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Verified, thanks, Yann. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Slaunger: Fixed. Yann (talk) 19:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, the quality of the reproduction doesn't really convince me here. Aliasing is visible, red/black lines are blurry. Those are just hints that make me suspect that the quality of the reproduction is limiting the amount of information we get about the original, which I don't find FP-worthy. — Julian H.✈ 16:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Comment This would be better as PNG. Yann (talk) 19:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
