User talk:MGA73
|
These 2 images[edit]
Should these 2 images be passed below....which are on the bad authors list? One says it is Public Domain and the work of US Marines while the other image of Haley appears to be US Government work:
- File:Afghanistan 110605-M-XX999-003 (5839031876).jpg
- File:Ambassador Haley and Yezidi Advocate Hassan (37083541551).jpg
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Secondly, why was IIP Photo Archive, the source for the Haley image put on a blacklist when its photos are US State Department Government work...even when the flickr profile says it should be for non-commercial use which is not legally enforceable. This image would be put on the bad authors list which makes no sense? Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: I think the 2 photos are okay. I wonder if anyone from the US can explain why they are on bad author list. As far as I know its a part of the US Gov and therefore PD. The only reason I can think of is if non-governement photographers can share their photos on the website so that not all the photos are PD.
Perhaps ask on Commons talk:Questionable Flickr images to hear what other users think? --MGA73 (talk) 10:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: OK, I will ask there. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
License Review[edit]
Dear Michael,
- Has the rules changed today that an uploader can review his images?. Please see this file history Or did I do something wrong. I am not an Admin unlike you or User:Christian Ferrer Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Or can Admins review images that they uploaded because they are trusted enough like this person Ahonc? Just curious. I am signing off and going to bed now. --Leoboudv (talk) 11:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I think an uploader should not review own uploads. I have sometimes transferred files from Wikipedia to Commons and reviewed the file there. But then someone else have already uploaded the file to Wikipedia. --MGA73 (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: you did well. Though apparently not an official policy or guideline, Commons:License review#Instructions for reviewers is very clear: "Please note that as of 21 February 2012, image-reviewers may not review their own uploads unless the account is an approved bot. This ensures that at least two individuals, or one individual and a bot, have checked that the license choice is correct." Let's notify @Ahonc: who uploaded and reviewed the file. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Thanks MGA73 and Christian Ferrer about the advice. I thought that Admins may have different rules here. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: If you can, please delete my first upload in this file here: File:Diego Gutiérrez cuba.jpg. Thank You Michael, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: deleted. --MGA73 (talk) 07:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank You Michael. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Happy May Day Michael!
If you have some time please delete this category below that I accidentally created:
- Secondly, it is possible that the PDM images I filed for Deletion can perhaps be passed by your bot after all. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! I deleted the category. About the space photos I can pass them if someone close as keep. --MGA73 (talk) 13:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I guess we will wait a while for the DR to close. Thanks again. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This clear Derivative PDM image DR was missed. It should have been closed as delete. Sadly this image is still in use. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Yeah it is in use. So it might be worth to see if anyone know how to check if copyrighted. I commented the DR. --MGA73 (talk) 14:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: I have passed some and nominated some for deletion so hopefully Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review will soon be fixed :-) Have you looked at the sub categories of Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - not ok lately? --MGA73 (talk) 17:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I have been busy with work. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- No worries :-) Happy you have more work to do again. Hopefully things are getting better in Canada. I passed a few more files and nominated others for deletion. --MGA73 (talk) 07:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I have just one thing to say. The images in Category:Files from 45379817@N08 Flickr stream should all be deleted since the flickr author has said "While some photographs are mine, the majority are images acquired from various sources on the Internet.
I've made the effort over the last few years to collect these images of BC, mostly of postcards, for the purpose of HISTORICAL INTEREST.
I maintain them here and keep them PUBLIC for the enjoyment and learning of all who may be interested.
I claim NO ownership or copyright to any of the acquired, historical images."
There is no chance that he took this old 50 or 60 year old images. One of the images is under a DR and no one has closed it as delete...and all the other images should be deleted in a mass DR filed maybe by you...if you can do it. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe only this 1930's postcard can be saved File:Postcard- Anglican Cathedral, Prince Rupert, BC, c.1930s.jpg under PD-Canada as it was made by 1945. Nothing else is OK. --Leoboudv (talk) 11:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: that sounds as a good reason to delete the files. --MGA73 (talk) 13:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:SSN-758 Patch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 14:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mcas iwakuni a insig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Iwakunicommstrat (talk) 01:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Buneset.jpg
- File:Burchardikirche.jpg
- File:Burg altena 02.jpg
- File:Die Stadt Dinant.jpg
- File:Dinant Gericht.jpg
- File:Dinant Rathaus.jpg
- File:Fontane-Geburtshaus.jpg
- File:Gletschertopf in der Nähe von Nesland auf den Lofoten.jpg
- File:Gustav Kühn Denkmal.jpg
- File:Halberstadt01.jpg
- File:Halberstadt02.jpg
- File:Halberstadt03.jpg
- File:Halberstadt04.jpg
- File:Hogskrova Aussicht.jpg
- File:Kirchplatz Neuruppin.jpg
- File:Klimadiagramm Bsp 01.jpg
- File:Stadt altena.jpg
- File:Stamsund 2009.jpg
- File:Stamsund Aussicht.jpg
- File:Å i Lofoten 2009.jpg
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 11:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Dear Michael or MGA73,
Please kindly review this quality image if you can. I got it licensed freely from a contact at flickr. I only upload quality images...and no porn junk. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Leoboudv: . Done! MGA73 (talk) 12:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Michael for your kind help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)