Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Screws city line.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Screws city line.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 11:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
Info created and uploaded by Wilfredor, nominated by Yann
Support I like the comparison between technology and modern city skyline. Very good quality. -- Yann (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per Giles Laurent. Thanks to him. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular composition! ★ 14:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment Wilfredor, I believe this is missing a {{Retouched picture}} and a Digitally manipulated photographs category? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The result is beautiful on thumbnail but looking closer I'm disturbed by the fact that the reflexion of every object is not starting right at the bottom of each object individually as it should be the case for a real reflexion. We can also still see a visible line along the bottom of the screws (probably resulting from the copy pasted picture of the objects) that seems to have been forgotten to be deleted. Can that be improved ? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is also many weird artifacts across the whole image that should be fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to Giles Laurent for his helpful detective work. Any manipulation needs to be flagged on the file description page. I withdraw my support until this issue is clarified. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is also many weird artifacts across the whole image that should be fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Undeclared photo manipulation (like this one and so many before) with visible technical flaws. Unwatch now -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not impressed. Why are there so many nails? it reminds me of how in China they build a ton of identical high rises in a cluster. It's too realistic of a city Henrysz (talk) 06:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That reminds me strongly of two of my own pictures (both FP): File:Sechskantschrauben -- 2020 -- 3985-8.jpg and File:Schrauben, Muttern und Unterlegscheiben -- 2020 -- 4150.jpg --XRay 💬 07:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Undeclared photo manipulation. Yann (talk) 09:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- After someone's comment, I added the manipulations made, corrected the problems, and uploaded the new versions, all detailed on the description page. However, I think there is a lack of trust in my nominations why did some people withdraw their vote in favor without checking if what this person said, both the explanations about the modifications and the graphical errors, existed in the photograph?. Therefore, I thank Yann for his nomination and I understand the concern of some people here about me, but I am not well psychologically speaking and I feel it is necessary to withdraw indefinitely from this section because it causes me a lot of stress. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would have supported if all of the image problems would have been fixed but the reflexion is still wrong and you can see on this image how something closer to a real reflexion would look like, i. e. the reflexion needs to start at the bottom of each screw individually. Also, there are still plenty of artifacts and graphical errors across the image on the new version of the file (these are just examples I have quickly selected but there's probably more). The best would be to start again the edit from the original file because there are many places were dust is not the same above and on the reflexion because it was only removed on one of them. Feel free to fix all of these issues and to renominate the picture once you feel better. Best wishes of recovery 🍀 -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Or easier way : just place the screws on a real, big and clean mirror and take the picture again and there will be no complicated post-processing needed. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would have supported if all of the image problems would have been fixed but the reflexion is still wrong and you can see on this image how something closer to a real reflexion would look like, i. e. the reflexion needs to start at the bottom of each screw individually. Also, there are still plenty of artifacts and graphical errors across the image on the new version of the file (these are just examples I have quickly selected but there's probably more). The best would be to start again the edit from the original file because there are many places were dust is not the same above and on the reflexion because it was only removed on one of them. Feel free to fix all of these issues and to renominate the picture once you feel better. Best wishes of recovery 🍀 -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- After someone's comment, I added the manipulations made, corrected the problems, and uploaded the new versions, all detailed on the description page. However, I think there is a lack of trust in my nominations why did some people withdraw their vote in favor without checking if what this person said, both the explanations about the modifications and the graphical errors, existed in the photograph?. Therefore, I thank Yann for his nomination and I understand the concern of some people here about me, but I am not well psychologically speaking and I feel it is necessary to withdraw indefinitely from this section because it causes me a lot of stress. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
