File:Stamp Germany 1999 MiNr2068 Design Hirche.jpg
Original file (1,358 × 827 pixels, file size: 237 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Contents
Summary[edit]
DescriptionStamp Germany 1999 MiNr2068 Design Hirche.jpg |
English: Stamp from Deutsche Post AG from 1999, Design in Germany - TV HF1 by Herbert Hirche
Deutsch: Briefmarke der Deutschen Post AG aus dem Jahre 1999, Design in Deutschland - Fernsehgerät HF1 von Herbert Hirche |
Date | |
Source | Deutsche Post AG, scanned by Steveurkel |
Author | Ingo Wulff für das Bundesministerium der Finanzen und die Deutsche Post AG |
Picture description | Fernsehgerät HF1 von Herbert Hirche (110 Pfennig) |
---|---|
First day of issue | 12 August 1999 |
Publisher | Deutsche Post AG |
Design | Ingo Wulff |
Circulation | 8.000.000 |
MICHEL Nr. | 2068 |
Scan by | Steveurkel |
Licensing[edit]
TV[edit]
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This image is of an object with an intrinsic utilitarian function, and is consequently not a derivative work. Thus, the object itself is in the public domain. However, not all images of such objects are in the public domain. Thus, in order for this template to be permissible, the image itself must also be free under copyright law - whether because it's in the public domain (e.g. covered by a tag such as {{PD-USGov}}, or {{PD-old}}) or because it was freely licensed by the photographer or copyright holder; see Commons:Copyright_tags. In a nutshell:
See this derivative works exception. In brief, per the Supreme Court’s decision in Mazer v. Stein, useful articles, regardless of factors such as mass production, commercial exploitation, and industrial designs are not subject to copyright protection. The declaration that “pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works” include “works of artistic craftsmanship insofar as their form but not their mechanical or utilitarian aspects are concerned” is classic language; it is drawn from Copyright Office regulations promulgated in the 1940’s and expressly endorsed by the Supreme Court in the Mazer case. The design of a useful article shall be considered a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work only if, and only to the extent that, such design incorporates pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features that can be identified separately from, and are capable of existing independently of, the utilitarian aspects of the article.” A “useful article” is defined as “an article having an intrinsic utilitarian function that is not merely to portray the appearance of the article or to convey information.” A two-dimensional painting, drawing, or graphic work is still capable of being identified as such when it is printed on or applied to utilitarian articles such as textile fabrics, wallpaper, containers, and the like. The same is true when a statue or carving is used to embellish an industrial product or, as in the Mazer case, is incorporated into a product without losing its ability to exist independently as a work of art. Although the shape of an industrial product may be aesthetically satisfying and valuable, that does not entitle it to copyright protection. Unless the shape of an automobile, airplane, ladies’ dress, food processor, television set, or any other industrial product contains some element that, physically or conceptually, can be identified as separable from the utilitarian aspects of that article, the design cannot not be copyrighted. The test of separability and independence from “the utilitarian aspects of the article” does not depend upon the nature of the design—that is, even if the appearance of an article is determined by aesthetic (as opposed to functional) considerations, only elements, if any, which can be identified separately from the useful article as such are copyrightable. And, even if the three-dimensional design contains some such element (for example, a carving on the back of a chair or a floral relief design on silver flatware), copyright protection would extend only to that element, and would not cover the over-all configuration of the utilitarian article as such. Subject to disclaimers. |
Other elements[edit]
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship. |
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
The depicted text is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain because it is not a “literary work” or other protected type in sense of the local copyright law. Facts, data, and unoriginal information which is common property without sufficiently creative authorship in a general typeface or basic handwriting, and simple geometric shapes are not protected by copyright.
This tag does not generally apply to all images of texts. Particular countries can have different legal definition of the “literary work” as the subject of copyright and different courts' interpretation practices. Some countries protect almost every written work, while other countries protect distinctively artistic or scientific texts and databases only. Extent of creativeness, function and length of the text can be relevant. The copyright protection can be limited to the literary form – the included information itself can be excluded from protection.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 15:15, 2 April 2010 | 1,358 × 827 (237 KB) | Steveurkel (talk | contribs) | {{Information |Description={{en|1=Stamp from Deutsche Post AG from 1999, Design in Germany - TV HF1 by Herbert Hirche}} {{de|1=Briefmarke der Deutschen Post AG aus dem Jahre 1999, Design in Deutschland - Fernsehgerät HF1 von Herbert Hirche}} |Source=Deut |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on arz.wikipedia.org
- Usage on de.wikipedia.org
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on www.wikidata.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
_error | 0 |
---|