Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rufous-throated Partridge 0A2A9937.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Rufous-throated Partridge 0A2A9937.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 12:20:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rufous-throated Partridge
Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cart's statement comes across as passive-aggressive. If I understand correctly, you are directly placing me in the category of "voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically". That's fine, do you; there's a legitimate reason why I don't post my pictures here, but that doesn't make me any less inadequate. I have no problem with the other responses here, except Cart's. Keep in mind that this is not the first time it has occurred; see here. Wolverine XI 07:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There can be no argument on the settings used. But the criticism in the context of FPC is valid. It is difficult to take an FP-standard image in low light. I would be more than happy to support this level of technical quality if the bird was rare. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, this.  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly agree with you. This issue should be addressed. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]