Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:На Свидовецькому масиві.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:На Свидовецькому масиві.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2019 at 12:03:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
- Info created & uploaded by Misha Reme - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:03, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:03, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Excellent choice of lighting and composition. Bit grainy – I’d have applied less sharpening. Still great. --Kreuzschnabel 12:39, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The sky seems posterised, but that is probably fixable. Otherwise great shot! --Domob (talk) 15:20, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Without a fix to the posterisation issue, I have to oppose regretfully. --Domob (talk) 06:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - I see what Domob is referring to in terms of posterization: There are lines in the sky that don't look like they would have really been there but are simply boundaries between different hues; these are subtle but should be smoothed out. However, there is also a big dust spot that's partly cropped out, right at the top margin a bit to the right of the upper left corner. That needs to be removed (which could be as simple as cropping out a very small part of the top of the photo), and then I will support, as I love the composition, the colors and the painterly sensibility of this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Dinkum (talk) 21:47, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I love the composition and I had considered nominating this image myself last week, but the posterisation is something you can't unsee once you've seen it. Definitely FP when that is fixed. Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Posterisation is too obvious. Would support if better processed from raw (I'm sure plenty folk would offer to try if you asked). -- Colin (talk) 12:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose, tries too hard IMO. Between the distractingly unsharp foreground landscape and the banding in the sky, this is a great image that unfortunately came out as just good here. Daniel Case (talk) 21:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- A shame. Like Cmao20 said, it's hard to unsee the posterization once you see it. Starts to look like phantom mountains in the background. Seems quite fixable, though. — Rhododendrites talk | 05:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Regretful Weak oppose for now – the banding/posterization in the sky should be fixed. --Aristeas (talk) 18:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support I dont care the posterisation, the composition is too much spectacular --Wilfredor (talk) 00:55, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Question - What about the big dust spot? You don't care about that, either? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:42, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)